Wednesday, September 23, 2009

It's over, isn't it?

Every time a software company gets acquired the relevant community starts spinning. Employees fear for their jobs, customers are concerned about their projects, analysts write another paper and of course the competition has a field day. The recent acquisition of Vignette by Open Text has been no different. Of course Open Text needs to reduce head count since Vignette has been reporting losses since before the term WCM was even invented. Everybody that followed Tom Jenkins and John Shackleton over the years knows that burning cash is not an option. But before you bitch about it: 2.2 billion in market cap suggest they doing something right...

When we talk about the products the situation seems complicated. But unlike many "experts" believe, the actual product is not really the issue. If customers would buy software from a startup with a handful of developers, why would they be concerned if a billion dollar company maintains a handful of those developers to keep the product alive? Do you know of any customer of Gauss or Obtree that was forced to migrate to RedDot? Face it: every player is going to get acquired at some time and keeping a product alive keeps the maintenance revenue consistent.

Don't get me wrong, just maintaining a product is always easier (and cheaper) than to innovate. But we also need to admit that the WCM market hasn’t innovated for a long time. What actually happens is that as the products mature and become more stable they work better within the orchestra of tools we need to run a business. But real innovation is not happening. And just to be perfectly clear, social media doesn't count. The fundamentals have been invented 15 years ago and it doesn't count as innovation just because we call it "social" instead of "collaboration" adding some AJAX and better usability. In the auto industry they call that a facelift. Ask your vendor about the top 3 minds behind their social media product and I am sure you'll find 2 of 3 being a collaboration or communication veteran.

But there is something with this deal, which is different. It's the last big one! Believe it or not, there are no more fighters for the greater good in that market; no more idealists that are on a mission. Over are the days when Vignette and Interwoven outsmarted each other to charge a million $ for a website, over are the days of RedDot kicking both their asses :-) Do you even remember Stellent? What is left is a long list of small or smaller companies. Believe me, many are decent businesses run by good managers but still: it is time to exit my friends.

Vendors have two options. Focus on a niche market and sell later or sell the business now. I am happy to discuss my logic behind that but if you follow me for a moment, that leaves two options for customers - either buy from a big player and get an 80/20 solution or buy from a smaller, more focused player and deal with them being acquired sooner or later. Both options come with pain and your decision depends on how mature you think WCM truly is.

So is it over?

6 comments:

Jens said...

First let me say: WCM is not the future. ECM with social network components (like Google Wave) are the future. But:

It's sorry to say, but be sure: It's not over, yet. Other companies will be taken, again, after Vignette was also "finished" next years.

For me as a ECM software company in a small and medium size business, the customers ask us every day: "You're a small company - are you very sure, that you will be survive the next 10 years?" - I'm very sure, it'll be! Because DocuPortal is a innovative, growing and stable company. But often, the companies decide to use a product like a "RedDot" or "OpenText", because it's a BIG and "STABLE" company - and don't see, what's going on, on the ECM market, last years (also see at IBM, Oracle, etc). Customers should not sure to invest into an old and classic product. RedDot, Gauss etc are perfect examples.

But it's also the big chance for young, innovative and growing companies like DocuPortal to give the customers back, what they want: A flexible company with direct support, easy to use software, small invest and a fast ROI.

Some, new companies will come and other companies will be acquired again ... and again ... and again ...

Regards
Jens Buescher,
CEO DocuPortal

christoph said...

Daniel,

I'm glad that at least someone keeps a clear head in that discussion. I totally agree with you about the impact of the OpenText / Vignette / RedDot deal.

In my opinion the most important point is your statement about innovation - the WCMS concept seems to me like a stoneage tool in a computer century. And if I have a look at the WCMS market I really can't see that there is at least one vendor with a new or innovative concept. So I think OpenText is right to announce that they want to develop a (hopefully...) total new concept and solution.

Jon Marks said...

Do we remember Stellent? Oh yes - unbelievably it is the most complete CMS offering according to the latest Gartner MQ. Are people still innovating in WCMS - yes, I think so. But it's coming from the smaller players, not the big boys. Even the mid-market people are trying to become all things to all people and not playing in a niche any more. And finally, I think a company like OTEX is going to struggle to build a brand new product from the ground up. Especially if they even pretend to have an upgrade/migration path for old RedDot/Vignette customers into it. They'll get hamstrung by back compatibility.

Thoughts on all this here:
http://jonontech.com/2009/09/15/when-cms-genes-wont-splice/

and here:

http://jonontech.com/2009/09/23/web-in-a-box-or-mix-and-match/

and here:

http://jonontech.com/2009/08/10/what-has-the-ministry-of-magic-quadrants-got-against-me/

Tom said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Tom said...

My comments.

"every player is going to get acquired at some time and keeping a product alive keeps the maintenance revenue consistent."

There is a difference between keeping a product alive and investing in it for the future. SDL continued to invest in Tridion after the acquisition, and the results have been very positive. Does anyone really think either RedDot or Vignette are going to receive any true investment over the next few years beyond bug fixes? There is indeed innovation in the WCM market and if I were either a RedDot or Vignette customer I'd be worried that my vendor isn't going to evolve along with the market.

"But real innovation is not happening."

Real innovation is indeed happening. Look at what Alfresco and Day have done for WCM architectures and standards. Or what SiteCore and Ektron are doing with marketing suites. Or what Tridion is doing for multisite management. Vignette and RedDot are both in their current predicament because they haven't kept up with the recent innovation in the WCM market.

"Believe it or not, there are no more fighters for the greater good in that market; no more idealists that are on a mission. Over are the days when Vignette and Interwoven outsmarted each other to charge a million $ for a website... Do you even remember Stellent?"

Were there ever idealists? Commercial software companies are in the business to make money. The best way to make money is to release products customers want to buy. I'd think you'd be surprised at the number of million dollar WCM deals that are still being done each quarter by a large number of vendors. And to your point about Stellent, you may not hear the name because Oracle has rebranded it but Oracle has done a great job of getting UCM into companies through their existing CIO relationships. I suspect Oracle views the Stellent acquisition as a great success.

"Vendors have two options. Focus on a niche market and sell later or sell the business now."

Vendors have a third option- stick to business as usual by listening to customers and releasing good products. I think most WCM vendors will take this option.

Damian said...

People often look for innovation in a product where really the innovation comes from the application of that product. The concept of a WCM product acting as a presentation layer is probably the best innovation rather than a specific integration or a trendy 2.0 style interface.

Innovation is the team who can meet a business requirement with an efficient, elegant solution.

Just ask the National Trust Intranet Team!

Post a Comment